Latest News
Assassinanny 911?
I have gotten several e-mails from various people (and I think someone mentioned it in the comments as well) that the third episode of season two will be titled 'Assassinanny 911'. Not that I don't believe you, but the only source I have been able to find with this info has been Wikipedia's VB episodes listing. Not that I don't trust Wikipedia (even though someone removed a link here as 'superfluous'), and it certainly sounds like a VB episode name, but I have no idea where they're getting their information, so I won't add it to the capsules just yet.
But I suppose for all intents and purposes episode sixteen is named Assassinanny 911, because I'm sure it's right.
Also there's still plenty of time to enter the season one DVD giveaway. The cutoff will be 10:00pm EST on Sunday, so if you haven't entered and want to, that's how much time you have left!
Also don't forget that the premiere will be up on Adult Swim Fix at 6pm EST tonight if you don't want to wait until Sunday. Later kids!
Edit (3:35pm) - Okay, I caved to peer pressure and added it to the capsules! I'm so weak.
But I suppose for all intents and purposes episode sixteen is named Assassinanny 911, because I'm sure it's right.
Also there's still plenty of time to enter the season one DVD giveaway. The cutoff will be 10:00pm EST on Sunday, so if you haven't entered and want to, that's how much time you have left!
Also don't forget that the premiere will be up on Adult Swim Fix at 6pm EST tonight if you don't want to wait until Sunday. Later kids!
Edit (3:35pm) - Okay, I caved to peer pressure and added it to the capsules! I'm so weak.
- by MadsTheRebel
- (unregistered id: CEBC9DD58E)
Tv.com has the third episode listed as Assassinanny 911 too... http://www.tv.com/the-venture-brothers/show/17591/episode_listings.html?season=2
Jun. 23, 2006, 7:24pm
- by Mike
- (unregistered id: 5EDB3ED1BD)
- by Bhaakon
- (unregistered id: 321CBC15A5)
It did lack something: a plot.
That, and I thought they answered too many questions at one time, and without raising new ones to replace them. IMO, it would have been better to string the audience along for a few episodes than explain away the central mystery of the previous 12 episodes in a scant few seconds of exposition.
Pretty freaking funny, though. Jun. 25, 2006, 10:56am
That, and I thought they answered too many questions at one time, and without raising new ones to replace them. IMO, it would have been better to string the audience along for a few episodes than explain away the central mystery of the previous 12 episodes in a scant few seconds of exposition.
Pretty freaking funny, though. Jun. 25, 2006, 10:56am
Trying to vote on a comment, eh? You need an account to do that! You should totally get one! You'll get your own username and can participate in community stuff. It's awesome! Already have an account? Log in above!